AI-powered abstract management for academic, scientific, and professional conferences. From call for papers to final decision — automated.
Track paper submissions, enforce blind review, and publish proceedings from a single platform built for scholarly peer review at any scale.
Manage multi-track reviewer pools, detect conflicts of interest automatically, and generate acceptance decisions with a single click.
Handle speaker proposals, poster submissions, and award nominations simultaneously — each with their own review criteria and deadlines.
One click assigns best-fit reviewers using expertise vectors, COI graphs, and workload balancing.
Conflict-of-interest graph prevents reviewers from evaluating collaborators or affiliates.
Authors upload a PDF and AI pre-fills title, abstract, keywords, and co-authors automatically.
Track submission rates, acceptance ratios, reviewer activity, and topic distribution live.
Admins, organisers, authors, co-authors, and reviewers with precisely scoped access.
Score Originality, Quality, Relevance, and Clarity with separate author and organiser tracks.
Set submission windows, blind review config, and branding.
Customise your portal and send mail-merge invites.
Authors verify email and complete academic profiles.
Title, keywords, co-authors, docs — or AI-filled from a PDF.
Import via Excel; invitations sent automatically.
One click: AI assigns 1–3 reviewers with full COI avoidance.
Reviewers score four dimensions plus dual-track comments.
Approve AI-suggested decisions; authors notified with full audit trail.
Authors revise and resubmit; optional re-review cycle.
Accepted presenters confirm, upload slides and bio.
Excel, PDF, CSV exports, abstract book, and analytics.
Publish proceedings, issue certificates, and archive the full event.
We ran our largest conference ever — 847 submissions — with a team of three. Qlasa's AI matching saved us at least 40 hours of manual reviewer assignment.
The COI detection caught three reviewer conflicts our previous system missed entirely. That alone justified switching from EasyChair.
Setup took 25 minutes. Our authors had a clean submission portal the same afternoon. I've never configured a conference system that fast.
Between enterprise complexity and free-tool chaos.
| Capability | EasyChair | ScholarOne | Qlasa |
|---|---|---|---|
| AI Reviewer Matching | |||
| Modern UI / Mobile | |||
| Self-serve setup <30 min | |||
| Affordable pricing | |||
| Abstract Book Generator | |||
| COI Detection | |||
| Blind review support | |||
| Advanced analytics |
Set up your first event in under 30 minutes. No IT team, no enterprise contract, no chaos.